OI, R 8 and O XVII, R 3 Representative Failure to Produce Evidence, 3, CPC for Production of Evidence and On Their Failure to Present Evidence on Relevant Day, Following Courts O XVII, R 3 , C XC Accuracy Supply O XVII, dismissing invalid claim of proof by applying R. The CPC, however, shows that in nature it is legitimate and arbitrary and not mandatory when a party fails to present evidence, the court may close its evidence and, at the same time, require the law. Can also be used on such arbitrary options. In the present case, the record shows that on the day of the incident, the plaintiff was not present before the court and in such a situation, the proper course of action was to file an OI through the CPC. X, R 9, was a dismissal of an unlawful action case under CPC, in the absence of the plaintiff, applying the sentence of O XVII, R 3, the CPC did not appear to have acted under the concurrent law. Reasonable and justified. The discovery of the two courts below, which were the result of illegal and unlawful exercise of their jurisdiction, was held by the High Court with a fine of ten thousand rupees and one last chance for the defendants to present their evidence without proof.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
