Section 497 (5) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), the cancellation of bail in Section 302/34 murder, the petitioner / complainant was nominated for the respondent / accused in the FIR, but the complainant himself There was no eyewitness to the incident. , Nor did it indicate the authoritative source that the perpetrators were indicated to be involved in the commission of the crime, except that a verdict was granted to the Lokpal court pending a dispute over the women. Based on the valid reasons that were on the date of the DPP, the settlement of the arguments and the request for bail, the compliance of the notice contained in the provisions of section (1) of section 497, the CCP has already been processed, in which case the complaint. There can be no reason for cancellation of non-service guarantees of the applicant / applicant. Otherwise, when it was found eligible for bail, the grounds for approval and cancellation of the bail were completely different. Strong and unusual grounds were needed No bail was canceled indicating that the accused had tampered with the prosecution's evidence or that he had threatened the complaining party with misuse of the bail exception. Threatened to fulfill his illegal wishes, he could not cancel bail, conditions cancellation request guaranteed, dismissed
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
