The trial court granted a decree in the favor of one of the plaintiffs for the declaration and possession of 2% share of the suit property on the basis of the respective Kubhanm / Nakhonas of Articles 8 and 42, While the other plaintiff's claim was denied by the trial court's defendants, no appeal against the judgment and order passed by the trial court was filed by the plaintiff in the same case, from the trial. Their final decision against the relevant decision and order was made. , The appellate court accepted the appeal and the judgment of the plaintiff against both defendants to the extent of 1/3 of the entire plaintiff in the plaintiff's affidavit, the defendants who claimed ownership of the suit property 1 / To the extent of 2 shares, any document that failed to produce or cite a document that reflects the ownership of all or any part of the document, the document cited by the lawyer for the defendant ndants who was in the original case. Part and parcel and was not a private document and could not be relied upon at the revision stage to deny defendant's claim. Two courts, the conditions were maintained below had failed and he was unable to prove his version
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
