Find a Lawyer

ALAMGIR versus STATE

Section 497 (2) Control of Narcotic Substances (XXV of 1997), Section 9 Narcotic Bail Seizure, Grant of Further Inquiry, Awareness of Suspect Concealing Drugs in Secret Caves, More Investigations Needed , Because the prosecution didn't come on the record. No evidence to show his nexus with the Contract Band from the vehicle, in any such case, his previous interference or circumstance was granted to the accused in any overt act.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010

• ABDUR RASHEED v. State 2010 MLD 180
• KAMRAN SHAH v. State 2010 YLR 216
• CHERAT CEMENT COMPANY LIMITED v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Industries and Production, Ministry of Industries and Prod 2010 CLD 226
• MUMTAZ ALI v. State 2010 MLD 237
• Haji UMAR ZAMAN v. KABIR KHAN 2010 CLC 281
• ALI QASWAR BOKHARI v. MUHAMMAD ISLAM 2010 PCrLJ 282
• QADAR KHAN alias DOCTOR KHAN alias GUL MUHAMMAD v. State 2010 YLR 284
• AURANGZEB KHAN v. State 2010 MLD 288

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2010 →

us immigration advocates from Balakot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes