Sections 157, 160, 161, 169 and 561A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302/34 of the Law of Martyrs (10 of 1984), Arts 150 and 151 Quill AMD declare a witness to be unclean of the Order, The petition for Section H, which concerns the prosecution witnesses, during the investigation, they found the accused guilty of alibi's innocence and on his personal probation he was released under the CRPC, CCP. ? The petitioner / complainant complained that the trial court refused to accept his lawyer's plea and refused to give Section H an opportunity to testify and to examine him. No one was mentioned anywhere in any of the 1984 articles, but it was presented in the judicial context explaining Article 5050Q. Under the testimony of the law 1984, 1984, 1984, 150 150 150, it can be proved that the witness was grossly abusive, or that he was inconsistent in his statement, or he tried to suppress the truth or Has faced enmity. In the absence of any such move by the guard, the party was not entitled to the party to examine its testimony in order to impose its credibility on the witness, a witness who is contemptuous or opposing the party. That's what presented it for recording. In support of this, the evidence was allowed to corroborate the credibility of the witness by the type of evidence referred to in section 151 of the testimony of the law; the 1984 witness, which was offensive, did not necessarily speak because the opposing witness was a The way he gave his evidence shows that he did not intend to speak the truth in court.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
