By explaining the background of the trial case to the Section & & possession 42 suit, the trial and appellate court counsel for the plaintiff described the decision by the trial court and the appellate court counsel, respectively, in which the parties and their The claimant's title was originally specified. But when asked to refer to the evidence on record, they could not say that the lower courts did not, during the unclean judgment, apply their minds, which could not be sustained, to the impugned verdict. And the orders were put aside and that was the case. After recording additional evidence, it was returned to the trial court for re-decision
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
