Section 302 (b) / 324 / 337f (ii) / 34 convict AMD and attempt to compliment the evidence was defined as delay of two hours to thirty minutes in filing the FIR, not every delay in filing the FIR Thi is fatal in every case as it depends on the facts and circumstances of each case. Both the complainant and the prosecution's witnesses witnessed the incident, their testimony was in accordance with the contents of the FIR, which found no contradiction and both were the witness of the prosecutor, even though they were related to the deceased. Was from the people. But the relationship was simply disqualified, unless it was proved that the witness was unnecessary or interested in being involved illegally but nothing was available to prove that any eyewitness was guilty. There was animosity or interest in falsely executing him. A lengthy investigation, but nothing contrary to their mouths was extracted which was sufficient to prove that the witnesses were credible witnesses as an injured witness, assuming the truth of his presence on the spot. Went, points and vacancies were recovered from the spot where the victim and the injured witness were identified who confirmed the prosecution's case. Vacancy review by laboratory will not affect the matter. , As no weapons were recovered, as the investigating officer was able to satisfy himself about the pills. On the evidence of the doctor who did the post-mortem of the deceased's body and the post-mortem report there were four wounds on the victim's body, which confirmed the version of the four witnesses,
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
