Section 13 (d) (e) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), section 423 (1) (b) of unlicensed weapons and ammunition did not substantiate the evidence, but demanded a moderate reduction in sentence. Was. Under section 2323 ((1) (b), CCPC), the appellate court had the power to reduce the sentence without changing the outcome of the trial court, in the present case the appellant held that the case Evidence was not appreciated at trial by the trial. Unilateral view and contradictions were not considered, nor were its benefits extended in favor of it, despite the saying No details were provided of the alleged contradictions that needed to be considered, in addition to the case, three other criminal criminal cases, attempted murder and mills. The assault was registered against the accused and allegedly the weapons were recovered from the suspect's custody, it looked like it was a criminal weapon that said there was nothing in the criminal cases. What has happened to say other cases and there is nothing in the record to indicate that the accused was acquitted of major criminal cases, in which case, there was no basis for taking a gentle attitude and during the exercise. Section 2323 Cr, CRPC, dismisses the appeal to reduce the sentence imposed on the accused.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2010
