Section 392/34 Definition of Evidence of Robbery There is no indication that the defendants attempted to injure, injure, or improperly imprison anyone or to fear the crime, in the circumstances, at least for theft. It cannot even be covered in crime. Appeals for the defendants, which had a maximum sentence of three years with a fine of three years, were not pressurized, but a moderate reduction in the amount of punishment was sought and the recovery of the articles returned. There were contradictions in the complainant's statements regarding the. Evidence that the prosecution has raised serious suspicion has complained that its statements have improved over time, which has reduced the credibility of this report. On this occasion eyewitnesses of the complainant and other family members The members were, but their statements were not recorded by the investigating officer. Neither was he identified as a witness in the invoice, but on the basis of some dog-assisted search by the complainant, several individuals were designated wherever. It is not mentioned that the dogs escorted the accused to the residence, the original guilty complainant did not disclose that the trial court, considering the evidence, considered the contradiction in the statements of the witnesses. Did not and in the notes produced during the investigation failed to appreciate the material on the trial court record. In the presence of material contradictions, there was a reasonable doubt that the benefit of the accused would certainly go to the prayer of reduction of circumstances, it was not implemented, but the benefit of the doubt was given to the accused persons.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2010
