Find a Lawyer

ABDUL GHAFOOR versus STATE

Section 8 448 House requested delay of approximately eleven hours in filing an FIR and complainant did not disclose any reason for such delay: the trial court as well as the appellate court failed to appreciate the evidence and material contained on the evidence. And came to this conclusion, not only contrary to the facts, but also the violation of the law, which had to be set aside, contradictions and variations were identified; However, the benefit has not been extended to the accused. A breach of the rule of law was set aside by the lower courts and the accused were acquitted of the charge. \ R \ n

Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2010

• GUL WALI v. WIDOW OF SHEIKH GHULAM NABI 2010 YLR 1184
• ABDUL GHAFFAR v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1204
• HASIL KHAN v. State 2010 YLR 1209
• MANZOOR AHMED v. State 2010 MLD 1217
• Mst. SHAHNAZ PARVEEN v. ABDUL AZIZ 2010 CLC 1250
• NASIR HAYAT v. Syed QAMAR RAZA RIZVI 2010 CLC 1261
• ABDUL NASIR v. BIBI JANATORA 2010 CLC 1293
• Haji ABDULLAH v. KHURASAN 2010 PCrLJ 1308

All Quetta High Court Balochistan judgments of 2010 →

famous supreme court advocate from Chaininda lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes