Claims 8, 39, 42 and 54 of the suit, the declaration, the mutation's cancellation, division and permanent injunction were granted by the trial court after the trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs. The first appeal was filed against the High Court. The Court's conclusion regarding the defendants was, first, that the trial court did not properly handle the issues arising from the parties' requests; second, that while passing the judgment, the trial court Failure to make any decision on matters accordingly. And the contents of the record and that the trial court granted a contradictory decision and passed the contentious decision, deciding whether the plaintiff was a co-participant in the suit and private distribution of the case. ? There was no power in the trial court not to present the proper cases, as the defendants had not filed any application for the defendants to prepare the proper cases before the trial court during the same council proceedings, Could not indicate what the right cases should have been, which the trial court had not compiled and expressed prejudice to the defendants. The second objection of the defendants was that the trial court had passed a contradictory decision for the distribution of property in the dispute while deciding the matter, on which the trial court concluded that the issue was private between the plaintiff and the defendant. The division has already been affected. The two parties are enjoying possession of the property after the aforesaid partition.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2010
