Section 9 (c) drug possession evidence has the benefit of suspicion K 42kg weighing quantities of 1978 bars and 67 cubes allegedly recovered, according to the legal requirements to be sampled from each of the bars and cubes Should have To prove that all of this material was a drug investigating officer, and recovery witnesses failed to disclose the number of sticks and cubes from which the samples were taken. Such rods and cubes were also not separated from the rest, instead, only a small amount of 100 grams was sent to the forensic science laboratory, with witnesses incompetent, careless, and investigating at several points when they contradicted each other. Failure to meet the agency's law requirement was harmed. The prosecution's case and the suspect raised reasonable doubt about the recovery of the drug would go to the accused in such a way that the trial court failed to interpret the evidence and committed the economic irregularity that led to the prosecution's case. Deceased and the accused acquitted. Charge \ r \ n
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2010
