GENERAL MANAGER, WTR, PTCL, QUETTA versus DAILY MEEZAN AND OTHERS THROUGH 1-A MUHAMMAD ALI 1-B
Under section 81 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, the defendant filed a notice of land revenue receipt and permanent injunction for recovery of arrears as per the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 42 and 54. The defendants were outraged by the two notices issued. The plaintiff was instructed to submit the outstanding balance of the telephone connection within 15 days; the trial court appealed through the defendant against the trial filed by the plaintiff, but against the trial, the decision of the appellate court and the decree. On filing, partial appeal was allowed and in both the plaintiff's and the defendant's case, the appellate court's decision was filed that the old telephone number was changed to a new one. And his liabilities were already paid, but the notes were issued illegally and his phone was illegally attached to the claimant even though the plaintiff and his evidence tried to prove it. There was nothing rational against them, but the record records reveal that the plaintiff had clearly entered into the arrears of arrears and the applicant for payment in installments did not even have to disconnect his telephone. The petitioner also requested for the restoration in his letter record that the plaintiff was both old He is the user of the new telephone numbers / was owed in connection with the connection and dues, which was not paid by him on time and then could not be filed before the claimant courts, only To avoid the money on which they are sure
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2010
