EXECUTIVE COUNCIL, ALLAMA IQBAL OPEN UNIVERSITY, ISLAMABAD versus DR. M. TUFAIL HASHMI
Sections 2 (c), 2 (d), 9 and 10 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Appeal to the Legal Legislative Corporation Master and Servant's Service Tribunal Maintainability Employees, Under the Rule of Application The main penalties imposed on the defendants were the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance 2000, dismissed by the Service Tribunal under the jurisdiction of Section 4 of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973. The request raised by the authorities was that the defendant was not a civil servant. Therefore, the Service Tribunal had no jurisdiction. Decide on appeal `Person in corporation service 'or persons involved in public service, as described in Sections 2 (c) and (d) of the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance 2000, may be subject to the provisions of the Ordinance. Only those employees can refer to the Service Tribunal, which falls under the definition of Fiesta 'public servant in relation to the affairs of the Federation, the types of employees remaining. Yes, even if the contractor includes, if they face adverse action, the Service Tribunal was not the appropriate forum for redressal of these complaints, the Service Tribunal formed under Article 212 of the Constitution to redress these employees' grievances. Was the forum, whose terms and conditions were set out in Article 212 (1) (a) of the Constitution. Any action against persons who do not fall under the purview of a public servant will not be objectionable to the service tribunal as it was not intended to provide a forum for employees whose services were governed by illegal laws. Under section 2 (d) of removal of service (special powers) ordinance, `` government service '' was not appreciated by anyone,
