SINDH HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Temporary Constitutional Order [1 of 2007], Predictable Office of Judges (Judges) Order, 2007, Preamble Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 6 Application to bring to the notice of the Supreme Court about events that have been taking place in the last few days. ? That is, information published in print media and electronic media was also broadcast that the Government of Pakistan is considering withdrawing the notification / executive order dated 16th 2009, which includes the Chief Justice of Pakistan and the Supreme Court of Pakistan. Restoration and Emergency Declaration of Other Judges and Chief Justice, Temporary Constitution Order, 2007 and Office (Judges) Order, 2007, and under the appointment of Mr. Justice Abdul Hameed Dogar, judges of the Supreme Court were never dismissed or dismissed. Was. Since the Chief Justice of Pakistan was unconstitutional, because the office of the Chief Justice of Pakistan never vacated on 11 11, 2007 the executive order was passed, acknowledging the fact that the legal and legal status, the order passed by the then president. Was unconstitutional and outlawed. If an attempt is made to withdraw the aforesaid order, a major pillar of the state - the judiciary - would be intimidated. Thus, especially in view of the fact that in the terms of Article 6 of the Constitution, the turning point of the constitution, which was finally settled in view of the decision of the Sindh High Court Bar Association (PLD 2009 SC 879), or The decision was made. The government, including the head of the state or the head of the government or his other officials, may take any action to withdraw the executive order / notification of the restoration of judges, which was not otherwise in view of the apex court's decision. The Supreme Court has, in the circumstances, given all the constitutional and constitutional provisions of the country
