Find a Lawyer

MST. SHAHIDA ZAREEN versus IQRAR AHMED SIDDIQUI

O XLI, R 23 Appellate court remand on remand of a case relating to scope remand should be ordered in exceptional circumstances, when the appellate court deemed it necessary to decide the facts for the proper decision of the facts where evidence on record for the appellate court. Was enough The decision on the question involved, then the remand order should not be approved

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2010

• GULZAR AHMED v. YAQOOB KHAN 2010 SCMR 1108
• BANK OF PUNJAB v. HARIS STEEL INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. 2010 PLD 1109
• SHIFA INTERNATIONAL HOSPITAL LTD. v. CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2010 SCMR 1110
• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF KHAN v. KHAN SIDDIQUE 2010 SCMR 1116
• MUHAMMAD ARIF v. State 2010 SCMR 1122
• WAFI ASSOCIATES (PVT.) LIMITED v. FAROOQ HAMID 2010 SCMR 1125
• EXECUTIVE COUNCIL, ALLAMA IQBAL OPEN UNIVERSITY, ISLAMABAD v. Dr. M. TUFAIL HASHMI 2010 PLC(CS) 1125
• MUHAMMAD ABDUL MOIED v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Works 2010 PLC(CS) 1143

All Supreme Court judgments of 2010 →

immigration advocates email from Gawadar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes