Sections 22A, 22B, 154 and 200 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 FIR's constitutional application before the scope of the scope, the application for demolition of the exterior wall and the door of the applicant's house, etc., police After hearing the request of the Additional Justice of Peace / Additional Sessions Judge from the relevant Section H, denied by the Respondent, the High Court has been directed by the High Court to look into the contents of the petition and the law on it. Pass appropriate orders accordingly. The justification dispute between the parties was over. The home applicant had regained control, ordered the civil court against the defendant, and because of the infringement, he had the alternative of filing a private complaint to the civil court applicant; Another request was filed with the payer. Under the Lahore Development Act, the rules and regulations stipulated under the Judge NT Authority Act, 1975, were barred from registering an FIR under the Judge NT Authority Act, 1975, The High Court had erred in the law to exercise discretion in favor of the applicant as the Constitution's request could not be sustained as contentious questions of fact could not be decided. In the constitutional jurisdiction, the Supreme Court set aside the disappointing order in the circumstances. \ R \ n \ r \ n
