Section 10 Proof of Evidence The accused or someone else depositing the loan amount in the bank was not found guilty of his alleged misappropriation of the bank funds obtained by the borrower in the name of the borrower. The bank's manager misused the amount of Rs. 3,00,000 from the approved loan of Rs. 3,00,000 and proved it through overwhelming evidence through the record that it was alleged that the accused had been charged with others. Fraudulent and misconduct was committed by developing a method of obtaining loans in the name of. In his pocket, Loni himself clearly stated that he only received Rs 30,000 and did not receive Rs 2,70,000 and that his statement could not be defamed or defamed in the name of the borrower. The suspect cross check issued was replaced by crossing parallel lines with his signature, open or barrier check by the accused, and then surrounded by a holder at the bank counter, Received Rs 70,000, which could not be reached to the borrower, although for the sake of approval the loan was required to be provided in installments only, for his own benefit the accused 2,70,0 00 received the amount in a single charge, the accused's appeal was dismissed. Conditions
