CHAIRMAN AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN versus MUMTAZ KHAN
Section 4 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 and 310 (5) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 345 Reversal of the increase in crime of reinstatement in service i Sulk respondent was a bank employee and on The sentence was pronounced. The murder charge but later escalated crime between the parties and the respondent was acquitted after the payment of altered iShil when the defendant was convicted of the murder, the bank took action against him. And he was removed from the job. The bank refused to reinstate him. , After being acquitted of the charge, but the Service Tribunal allowed this appeal and reinstated him, accusing him of any unlawful interference, irregularity or unlawful use of his services by law. And was acquitted in connection with the murder. He was charged only with stabbing. The only culprit of the murder respondents, whom he was removed from the job, was as a result of which he disappeared badly, making him a fit and proper person. Emerged and was able to continue in his service until the defendant's order to remove him from the job also provided that the matter be considered by the competent authority for his rehabilitation. He was acquitted on criminal charges Respondents justified his claim of reinstatement in the service of successful criminal court, Supreme Court refused to interfere with the decision of the service tribunal, whereby defendant The appeal for reinstatement was dismissed
