EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, GEPCO LIMITED versus LIAQAT ALI
Section A, AA and Pakistan Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) The major conviction for refusing the allegations is that the Department of Inquiry, without any departmental inquiry, imposed mandatory retirement effect, therefore, Reinstatement of the service tribunal The respondents in their service, in full response, denied their defense requests as well as the supporting documents as well as the allegations of dishonesty of the relevant authorities against them, as the defendants The allegation was denied by the SEC, so it too became controversial and required an inquiry. In the provisions of Sections and and v, the removal of the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, the authorized authority was also obliged to follow the prescribed procedure before approving the imposition of a fine, ie service. Retirement was not the case under section 3 or section 3A, 5 (4) and 5 (5) of the Legal Opportunity for Removal from the Ice (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, where conducting investigations or hearing opportunities. Could not be conveyed to the authorities, nor was there any case brought under any of the provisions of the law, nor a case under which the Supreme Court had appointed the service tribunal. Refused to interfere with the decision passed by. Refused
