Section 302 (b) Conan testimony (10 of 1984) Re-reviewing the evidence to take advantage of the children's witness' corrosion suspicion; Was sentenced, and for what sentence was sentenced? The High Court had heard the case raised by the accused that his conviction is based on the sole evidence of the children's testimony, which is neither proven by medical evidence nor with the weapon of the crime. In principle, though, the conviction can be based on an intelligent and comprehensible testimony. Child witnesses But courts have generally preferred to adopt the principles of wisdom and governance associated with the sole testimony of children's intelligence witnesses, but despite medical evidence and arms recovery, no evidence exists to confirm the child's testimony. was not. Presenting the required support relates to four injuries to the medical evidence, which were the first to be executed and two were due to a gunshot wound. In the same breath, he acknowledged himself destructively that the injury could have been caused by a sharp weapon. Such evidence from the doctor has raised serious suspicion over the prosecutor's story based on the sole statement of the child's witness that the deceased was targeted by a sharp weapon, not a sharp weapon. The crime was recovered more than 2/2 years ago, nor was he reported to have a blood stain, nor was he sent for a chemical examination, nor was he charged or motivated. It has been proven, even though it may not be trivial, but it still has some pointers in mind
