MAP RICE MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED versus SHAKEEL AHMED
Section 12 (3) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XCI of 2002), Section 46 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Termination of Service Oral Orders New owners of industrial concerns, on oral orders, employed employees already working Complained to employees Suspending the notices and their dismissal orders, the Labor Court set aside his dismissal orders and reinstated the employees with the benefits of being put back on the job. The decision passed by the Labor Court was upheld by the High Court's endorsement and no evidence of any allegation against the employees could be proved. There were no responsibilities for liability Employees were terminated verbally and such an order had no legal effect as it would violate the relevant provisions, including the Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968. Was considered, and is not in accordance with Article 12 (3). No lawfulness or irregularity can be identified in the default law of Libhu's decision. All the evidence on the court or the High Court record was defined in accordance with the law and the justice of the justice by the Labor Court. Appreciating the principles of, the High Court refused to interfere with the High Court's decision. Appeal denied
