UNITED WOOLLEN MILLS LTD. WORKERS\' UNION LABOUR WELFARE CENTRE versus UNITED WOOLLEN MILLS LTD.
Section 11A, 12, 13 and 14 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 25A, restoration service restored his dismissal from the employment of the restoration administration justice on the basis that he was a Labor Court judge. It was revealed that he was not made a party. Under Section 11A of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968, the Labor Court allowed the workers' complaint with the observation that their rehabilitation would be open to interference because of the suspension. The orders did not give a clear reason as the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 showed poor utilization of powers or abuses, thereby restoring the employees to employment but exercising the jurisdiction of appeal. The findings of the High Court approved by the Labor Court The change. Termination order dismissed by the Labor Court in the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance Ordinance, 1968, following the proper definition of evidence, which, in accordance with the documentation and the essential provisions of the law Deprecated without being accepted. The Retirement Orders were a viable exercise of authority and were nevertheless unreliable, therefore, the dismissal / retirement orders were not endorsed and the Labor Court was justified in setting aside the valid reasons and The back was restored with benefits that were overturned without considering the necessary provisions. West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968, which the High Court
