Find a Lawyer

LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus MST. SHARIFAN BIBI

Section 115 Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Civil Revision Delay Deed The review petition filed by the applicant was banned and the High Court delayed the apology. Refused, resulting in the same rejection of the statute of limitations cannot be considered merely a formality and must be regarded in nature as the purpose of the statute of limitations was to aid vigilance and not the prisoner's helping hand. A litigant who goes to deep sleep cannot rise to the limelight; The attack was made aware and such an awareness had to be made because the fact that the Supreme Court refused to interfere with the exercise of discretion in relation to the question of limitation and the order passed by the High Court was neither illegal nor illegal. Was neither reasonable nor good on the grounds that it did not guarantee interference and the leave to appeal was denied.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2010

• ALI ASGHAR ABBASI v. State 2010 SCMR 693
• CHAIRMAN AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN v. MUMTAZ KHAN 2010 PLD 695
• SHOUKAT ALI v. State 2010 SCMR 697
• MUSHTAQ ALI SHAH v. N.E. D. UNIVERSTY OF EINGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, KARACHI through Vice-Chancellor 2010 SCMR 705
• HUFFAZ SEAMLESS PIPE IND. LTD. v. COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, HYDERABAD 2010 SCMR 707
• MAHBOOB ELAHI v. Mst. HAMIDA BEGUM 2010 PLD 709
• Dr. MUHAMMAD AMIN v. PRESIDENT ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LIMTED 2010 PLC(CS) 710
• Syed ZAHIR SHAH v. NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU 2010 SCMR 713

All Supreme Court judgments of 2010 →

online advocate from Panjgur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes