EXECUTIVE COUNCIL, ALLAMA IQBAL OPEN UNIVERSITY, ISLAMABAD versus M. TUFAIL HASHMI
Section 2 (c), 2 (d), 9 and 10 of the Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), removal of Section 4 appeal, before the Service Tribunal of the Employer of Legislative Corporations Master and the Servant Rule of Applicability Ordinance, 2000, relating to the major penalties imposed on the respondents under the provisions of the Service (Special Powers), was rejected by the Service Tribunal under the jurisdiction under Section 4 of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973, a petition taken by the authorities. It was that the defendants were not civil servants, therefore, the service tribunal had no jurisdiction to decide. Appeal's legal persons to the corporation service in or the persons involved in the public service, which are described in Sections 2 (c) and (d) of the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance 2000, are subject to the provisions of the Ordinance only. Can be made These employees can refer to the Service Tribunal, which falls under the definition of Fiesta 'public servant in relation to the affairs of the Federation, the types of employees remaining. ees, including the contractor, if they faced adverse action, the Service Tribunal was not the appropriate forum for redressal of these complaints; the service tribunal was required to resolve their employees' complaints under Article 212 of the Constitution. Was a forum formed, whose terms and conditions were set forth in Article 212 (1) (a) of the Constitution. Any action against persons who do not fall under the purview of a public servant will not be objectionable to the service tribunal as it was not intended to provide a forum for employees whose services were operating under illegal law or who Did not: ai praise someone in government service in
