Section 22 Sale Contract Specific Performance Denial of Currency Disclaimer The effective defendant terminated the contract to sell his house, and the trial court rejected the plaintiff's favor in favor of the lost money given to him by the plaintiff. But the High Court upheld the matter. In keeping with the principles of justice, equality, good conscience and fairness, the plaintiff could not be entitled to arbitrary relief on the specific performance of the sale contract considered under section 22 of the Special Relief Act, 1877; Was not entitled The plaintiff's right as a matter of contract was obtained from the date of the execution of the contract, ie 23 8 1987, but the defendant used the remaining amount of Rs 200,000 for his benefit and on the groundless application. Confiscated it and used it till date, therefore, she was also responsible for the reduction of the value of the currency and the constant trend of rising inflation, the payment of Rs. With the money, the judgment and order passed by the trial court will fail to be restored. The Supreme Court revised the decision and the High Court order passed.
