Find a Lawyer

JUMMA versus STATE

Sections 302 (b), 324, 337a (II) and 337a (i) attempt to murder, the cause of injury to Shuja and the evidence was examined during the strange hours of that night. The house, in which the complainant was also injured by the accused, had no reason to falsely accuse the accused's ocular account of the incident given by the complainant. Thi medical evidence confirmed the complainant's ocular testimony and the serologist's conviction confirmed the retrieval of the crime weapon from the accused in a blood stain on the accused and the defendant's sentence remained in the condition. Was placed and accordingly his appeal was dismissed.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2010

• EXECUTIVE COUNCIL, ALLAMA IQBAL OPEN UNIVERSITY, ISLAMABAD v. M. TUFAIL HASHMI 2010 SCMR 1484
• CHAIRMAN, STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION v. HAMAYUN IRFAN 2010 SCMR 1495
• SHAKEEL AHMED v. Mst. SHAHEEN KOUSAR 2010 SCMR 1507
• ABDUL SATTAR v. LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT 2010 SCMR 1523
• FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Housing and Works, Islamabad v. ABRAR AHMED 2010 SCMR 1537
• MUHAMMAD ABDUL MOIED v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Works 2010 SCMR 1546
• SUO MOTU CASE NO.9 OF 2010 2010 SCMR 1551
• MUHAMMAD ZAHEER KHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISAN through Secretary, Establishment 2010 SCMR 1554

All Supreme Court judgments of 2010 →

immigration advocates from Hyderabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes