Find a Lawyer

CHAIRMAN, STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION versus HAMAYUN IRFAN

Regulation 4 (II) (C) (2) General Clause Act (X of 1897), Section 24A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 4 and 5 (2) Assessment of Restoration Performance in Services Public Affairs Employees' Affairs The decision was made by the employer / employees of the respondents who were employees of the appellant corporation and their services were terminated due to poor performance of the average in the previous year. Allowed to evaluate the performance of the respondents according to the criteria laid down. In view of the duties of the Constitution and the authority authorized under Section 24A, General Clauses Act, under Articles 4 and 5 (2), it is the duty of the public court to decide the cases of the subordinates. 1897 The Service Tribunal did enough justice through its decision to decide subordinates' matters after using them with reasons in mind. The NTS and the Supreme Court refused to exercise their discretion in favor of the appellant corporation because the corporation failed to raise any question of public importance as Article 212 (3) of the Constitution considered the appeal dismissed. Done

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2010

• Dr. MUHAMMAD AMJAD v. Dr. ISRAR AHMED 2010 SCMR 1466
• ABDUL MAJEED v. PROVINCIAL POLICE OFFICER 2010 PLC(CS) 1469
• UNITED WOOLLEN MILLS LTD\'. WORKERS\' UNION v. UNITED WOOLLEN MILLS LTD. 2010 SCMR 1475
• EXECUTIVE COUNCIL, ALLAMA IQBAL OPEN UNIVERSITY, ISLAMABAD v. M. TUFAIL HASHMI 2010 SCMR 1484
• SHAKEEL AHMED v. Mst. SHAHEEN KOUSAR 2010 SCMR 1507
• ABDUL SATTAR v. LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT 2010 SCMR 1523
• JUMMA v. State 2010 SCMR 1530
• FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Housing and Works, Islamabad v. ABRAR AHMED 2010 SCMR 1537

All Supreme Court judgments of 2010 →

top advocate from Dinga lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes