BOLAN MINING ENTERPRISES versus BOARD OF TRUSTEES, EOBI
Refusing to hire Section 2 (BB) (C) (D) and 9 persons through a contractor, refuses to pay such person a contribution on the basis that the contractor through whom he was recruited. He was responsible for playing the legitimate language. The employees were free from any ambiguity in Section 2 (BB) of the Old Age Benefit Act 1976, as defined in Section 2 (c) of the Employees \ Old Age Benefit Act 1976, to consider the question Would require that the person through whom he was performing his duties, but not the person through whom he was employed, was acting in the administrative and financial control of the employer / appellant and not with the contractor, The contractor who worked only with the appellant worked as an agent. Or a middle man through whom the services of this person are protected, such person cannot be deprived of the benefits conferred under the Act, which is a beneficial legislation, is a legal and compulsory obligation of employment. r / The appellant had to contribute to the relevant funds in relation to such person The employer / appellant made a vain attempt to exploit certain legal provisions of the law to avoid legal liability to avoid legal liability. circumstances r \ n
