Find a Lawyer

NAEEM TARIQ SANGHERA versus CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE

Section (()) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Direct recruitment parties had requested that the leave applications for appeal be dealt with on the condition that the Government of Punjab arrange all examinations by the Prosecutor General. Be instructed Prosecutors are currently working in two stages in the province under section 8 (section 4) of section 8 of the Punjab Criminal Prosecution Service (Constitution, Duties and Powers) Act, 2006 that there should be no discrimination between the candidates, or So they should be treated equally in the first batch or second batch and before the Punjab Public Service Commission which states that irrelevant decisions were arranged without prejudice which remained in full force. Under which the prosecution branch was not charged. Assign applicants to the job during the stipulated period through the Supreme Court

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2010

• BOLAN MINING ENTERPRISES v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, EOBI 2010 SCMR 1573
• GHULAM RASOOL v. State 2010 SCMR 1579
• ITTEHAD CHEMICALS LIMITED v. VIITH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KARACHI (SOUTH) 2010 SCMR 1582
• FAZAL AHMED v. ARIF ANWAR SAEED 2010 SCMR 1584
• ALEEQ SHAH v. State 2010 SCMR 1590
• QURBAN HUSSAIN alias ASHIQ v. State 2010 SCMR 1592
• Mst. ASKAR JAN v. MUHAMMAD DAUD 2010 SCMR 1604
• SULTAN MUHAMMAD v. MUHAMMAD QASIM 2010 SCMR 1630

All Supreme Court judgments of 2010 →

tax advocates from Mirpur Khas lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes