ITTEHAD CHEMICALS LIMITED versus VIITH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KARACHI (SOUTH)
Section 8 and 21 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), after considering the orders, the landlord raised the rent of premises from Rs 8,178 to 96,000 rent, after considering the orders. Rental fixed rent fixed. The tenant's appeal was filed by the tenant against the tenant controller's decision; the appellate court filed a constitutional application by the tenant, which was also rejected by the High Court, the tenant filed a Supreme Court dispute. Before the appeal was filed for leave, the rent controller was completely realistic, evidence on record indicated the nearest rent around the premises and the rent controller. And the appellate court had given full consideration to the evidence on record while fixing a rent of Rs 80,000. The Supreme Court-certified Supreme Court will not consider re-evaluating the evidence and will change its findings for the rent controller. d The appellate court counsel for the tenant had requested that the rent increase be fixed from the date of the order of the rent controller and not the date of the petition filed by the landlord, which the Supreme Court rejected the tenant's request No justification. Available for interference with the decisions of both the courts as certified by the High Court, leave of appeal was dismissed
