Find a Lawyer

HASHMI CAN COMPANY LTD versus LIAQUAT MUHAMMAD

Section 25 An Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance Ordinance (VII of 1968), Section 11A and Section O12 (1) (3) Complaint Request Termination of Workers' Services under a Retention Order Approved by a Labor Court Employer ? The applicant was entitled to one month's notice of salary and the provision of sections O12 (1) and (3) of the Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968, for non-maintenance of service, based on the 1968 service. The removals were independent of each other Applicants submitted under Labor Court under Section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance will not refrain from submitting their complaints against dismissal to the applicant, obtaining permanent worker status in 1969 The worker will be free to express his grievances against termination of illegal employment. Service under conditions \ r \ n

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2010

• SUO MOTU CASE NO.9 OF 2010 2010 SCMR 1551
• MUHAMMAD ZAHEER KHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISAN through Secretary, Establishment 2010 SCMR 1554
• OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY v. NAZAR HUSSAIN 2010 SCMR 1559
• Mst. ROQIAZA AKBAR v. SECRETARY, EDUCATION (S&L), N.-W.F.P. 2010 SCMR 1564
• BOLAN MINING ENTERPRISES v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, EOBI 2010 SCMR 1573
• GHULAM RASOOL v. State 2010 SCMR 1579
• ITTEHAD CHEMICALS LIMITED v. VIITH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KARACHI (SOUTH) 2010 SCMR 1582
• FAZAL AHMED v. ARIF ANWAR SAEED 2010 SCMR 1584

All Supreme Court judgments of 2010 →

online advocate from Noorpur nooranga lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes