Disposal of Section 2 (b (b) Evidence of Alternatives) Opportunity to dispute the relevant witness evidence The accused was convicted by the trial court under Section 2 302 (b), PPC and sentenced to death by the accused. That the complaining party had substituted the original culprit, with the real father of the accused and the brother of the deceased could not substitute the original culprit with the accused as the substitution was an extraordinary event, as well as the prosecution's witnesses. Medical account was supported by a clear and confident eye of the eye with medical evidence and the purpose was not exposed to each other. As has been repeatedly suggested that on the basis of inter-relationship relationships which over time do not account for even minor contradictions in evidence, they can be safely ignored, even when mitigated. In the absence, the judgment passed by the trial court was well-grounded and was not guaranteed. The defendant had proved the accused guilty of the interference, presenting strong and concrete evidence presented by the witnesses and their Depending on the version the medical evidence, the stimulus was serious and free from any contradiction. And it can be given such clear evidence of the conviction and sentence protected. Supreme Court dismisses appeal pending trial
