Section 10 General Clause Act (X of 1897), Section 24A Proprietary Rights, Delivery of the Use of the Order Without Mind, In the first period of litigation, the question before the Board of Revenue was regarding the restoration of land but this In the subsequent proceedings, the appellants sought a grant of ownership. Rights Revenue Authorities refused to grant Appellants proprietary rights and the High Court upheld the Revenue Authorities' orders; in the first round of litigation, the Board of Revenue had "observed" without the satisfaction of the mind, In the particular case of resumption, the application of the property rights did not impede the decision-making authority. The High Court also erred in the law to observe that the appellants did not adequately analyze the relevant facts. Delay filed a constitutional petition before the High Court, with Apple in the first round of litigation In relation to the reclamation of the land acquired, it presented its interests in the interests, as a result of the property rights dispute to the Board of Revenue, all the orders of the revenue and the High Court ruled, the Supreme Court upheld the proprietary rights. The matter was remanded to the Collector for a new decision on the application for delivery of. The appeal filed by the appellant was \ r \ napproved
