Article 2 (d), 5, 6, 13 and 31 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) suit for pre-emption limitations In the present case, it was expressly conditioned that the balance be considered After the payment the sale will be processed. The amount, which would mean that the sale agreement between the parties was not terminated, despite the fact that the sale clause (C) of the North West Section 31 predicted the sale of the suit property to the shopkeepers / defendants. Was given to The Frontier Province Pre-Impression Act, 1987, provided that the period of limitation would commence on the same day that a seller would be physically occupied, but this clause also provided that `the sale was made \ with the parties. The courts below have also not been justified in treating the parties as a liability, rather than selling the contract that had foreseen an agreement in future history, after the payment of that balance, I had not yet located the case filed by the plaintiff as an adult or the plaintiff was entitled, if any, to the subject before the law , And when its sale was completed under Section 5 of the North West Frontier Province Pre-Impression Act, 1987, the plaintiff was dismissed. Because there was no cause for action in favor of the plaintiff yet
