Section 9 (c) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) contains evidence regarding drug seizure The crime was detected by two courts below the recovery of 3 kilograms of heroin. Heroin was recovered in his presence. At trial, the trial court convicted the accused under Section 9 (c) of the Narcotic Substances Act 1997 and sentenced him to 8 years imprisonment, a sentence which was upheld by the High Court. The following did not encounter any weakness or illegal activity recorded by the courts, the accused failed to identify any evidence that was misread or read by the courts below while the offense against the accused Detectives refused to detect the crime filed by the courts. Unless it can be shown below that the evidence on its face is either so clearly or inadvertently impossible that it is possible to accept the serious abortion of justice or the principle of defining evidence. Abuse or, ultimately, conviction of a crime can be physically impossible. The court was not lasting on the record and should have been intervened by the Supreme Court. It was alleged that he failed to bring his case within the parameters set by the Supreme Court on the subject of exercise of power under Article 185 (3) of the Constitution, refusing to interfere with the following courts. The resulting end results were found. It was alleged that he failed to raise any specific questions about the law and, in view of the concurrent inquiries of the courts below, the apex court had granted his award in favor of the accused.
