Section & & 15 15 Definition of evidence Sentencing, cross-appeal pardon trial court to increase sentence After considering certain facts, the mitigating circumstances in which the accused was sentenced to 18 years imprisonment Time and earlier, the accused was absconded, but was eventually arrested and detained if the amnesty earned by the accused was included in the 18-year prison term and at the time he was released, He was expelled, yet a conservative calculation revealed that the accused remained in jail for longer. 20 years; while calculating the duration of the sentence, according to this procedure the accused had to be released after completing 18 years when he was appealed by the trial court cross to increase the sentence of the accused by the complainant. Was, when no legal hearing could take place. The sentence of life imprisonment (14 years) or more has already been passed in the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1974, although it does not contain the specific clause / fundamental right contained in Article 13 of the Constitution of Pakistan. In view of the dual-risk doctrine and the scheme of law to deal with the Supreme Court's powers to do full justice in any case, cross-appeals filed for increasing the sentence were dismissed, stating that earlier in the relevant time He has been convicted of over 14 years in jail. , Was entitled to be released immediately
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2010
