SHAKEEL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY THROUGH MASOOD AHMED ABBASI, KARACHI versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Sections 12, 122 (5A), 124, 153 and 170 of the Federal Tax Ombudsman's Ordinance of Office of Establishment (XXV of 2000), Sections 2 (3), 9 and 10, are the sole proprietorship of the Amendment Due to the heavy transport. The trafficker and the garbage complainant were estimated to be taxed as a service provider and goods transporter, initiating proceedings under section 122 (5A) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, Complainant's receipts were classified as Additional Commissioner. Failed to state how the complainant could be treated as a contractor covered by clause C (c) of section 153 of section 153 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, when the Additional Commissioner The exception to the clause order was actually covered. The Federal Tax Ombudsman was equivalent to the mismanagement in terms of Section 2 (3) (i) of the Ordinance's Office, the 2000 recommendations to the Chief Commissioner under the tax paid to the Federal Board of Directors under section 122A of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Instruct and issue a refund in accordance with the law. Ask the Additional Commissioner, within 15 days, why the disciplinary action cannot be recommended against them. And whether he will be heard in person. An order appointed under the Commissioner (Appeal), under section 122 (5A) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, to examine the desire to reopen by an officer of the Additional Commissioner, Commissioner (Appeal). Day \ r \ n
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2011
