ASIF SIDDIQ versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Sections 25, 44, 48 and 216 of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance of the Office (XXXV of 2000), Complaint section 9 and 10, alleging mismanagement and embezzlement of imported goods. The complainant's offer was that he set up two letters for import. The complainant from China received information about the arrival of the goods to 60 M tonnes of urea formaldehyde and 60 M tons of glazing powder. Upon inspection, he was told that the equipment had already been cleaned by equipment / clearing and forwarding agents and equipment. The complainant moved to the complainant's brother-in-law's address, involved several individuals and agencies, government and girls in the complaint of misconduct and misconduct because the federal tax ombudsman's jurisdiction was solely until the mismanagement of tax employees. The inquiry was focused on the alleged mismanagement of the Customs Funk Tavenese subcommittee raised questions from donkeys and witnesses from the parties and the complainant faced questions related to the complainant's failure to submit to bank documents. He used to retire to clean his luggage, complainant He only said that he thought he would finish the goods. After the winter season, the re-opening of the dry port was not such a plausible explanation. The facts of the case proved that the complainant's sister-in-law had a brother. What a great fraud. The complainant's behavior did speak to his father-in-law about his activity, because without his approval, the supplier's transport system in China could not be changed, and the names of the suspects could CK Space
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2011
