INAMULLAH versus SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Establishment of Office of Sections 30, 156 (1) (10A) and 168 Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XVX of 2000), Sections 2 (3) (i) (A) and (B) (I), 9, Section 10 and 11 Section RO 576 (I) / 2006 Dated 5 6 2006 Complaints for deferred and forfeiture of vehicles on payment of dues and taxes, the complainant purchased an old and used vehicle from the person who bought the car at auction. Moved to name. The complainant, the customs staff, on the basis that it was an unpaid duty vehicle, was allowed to recover vehicles on payment of duty and tax payable under section R576 (I) / 2006 and on 5, 2006 The deliverance was fine. The value representative did not dispute the valid import of the vehicle and acknowledged that the complainant and the driver were innocent in the matter. And that the seller of the vehicle was responsible for obtaining the required NOC and disposing of the vehicle without the payment of duty and tax, exempting charge duty and other taxes at discounted rates in 2010 The addition was illegal. The complainant and the driver of the vehicle have been unfairly punished, rather than the importers who were responsible for paying duty and taxes, unfair and unfair, not to mention specific category offense for the exemption penalty. Was also involved in negligence and inability. Such a waiver of the Customs Collector's customs and corruption against the commission was due, the Federal Board of Revenue should be directed to the customs authorities to examine the customs duty with deductions when it was deducted. Vehicles; in this case, the innocent, appearing complainant and the driver
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2011
