T.F. PIPES, ISLAMABAD versus SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Complainant accused of non-payment of Section 60A & 170 Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (2000 V of 2000), Section 2 (3), 9, 10 and 11 Charging Workers \ Welfare Fund Refund Claim That the Fund was illegal for the year under the terms of Section 2 (3) of setting up the Office of the Charge Workers' Welfare / Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, the complainant prayed that the Department should vacate the illegal order. Be instructed and directed to issue refunds with compensation Department representatives did not agree with the complainant's representation and this was confirmed That the Workers Welfare Fund is not charged in the Complainant's case, the representative of the Department agreed to the Complainant's claim for refund, on the two sides helping each other to confirm the payment and settle the issue of refundable money. It was agreed that illegal correction orders would need to be implemented and amended by section 122A or 221 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, illegal orders for receiving workers / welfare funds, even Delays in the terms of section 2 (3) (1) (ii), even after the delay in the appeal decision and the issuance of a refund Was synonymous with The Federal Board of Revenue, 2000, established the Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, recommending that non-refundable returns be issued in accordance with the law after amending the orders under Section 122A / 221 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001. Reporting compliance within the day and within 7 days \ r \ n
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2011
