PESHAWAR ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY (PVT.) LTD., PESHAWAR versus SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Establishment of sections 11 (2), 33 (5), 34 (1), 36 (3) and 74 of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (2000V of XXXV), Section 2 (3), 9, 10 and 11 Input Adjustment The Complaint Company had allegedly misconducted by the Chief Commissioner and Additional Commissioner (Audit Division) Regional Tax Office for illegally refusing to allow input adjustments by the complainant, but non He was also charged with lawful error and other acts, including commission. Provincially-administered tribal, for the extension and sales tax act, 1990, based on the post of Additional Commissioner and originally for the postponement of the order, and to calculate the logical input adjustment. Areas could not be retained as irrational and discriminatory. This situation also had to be taken into account that other elements such as non-payment of law and order situation in Peshawar Electric Supply Company's service area. Sales tax is not paid in this area. , The Federal Board of Revenue's policy decision also needs to be scrutinized when rejecting line losses / distribution losses by 20% to 20%, stating that it is clearly discriminatory and unlawful. Which was akin to mismanagement and recommendations to reopen the Federal Board of Revenue. In the exercise of its power under section 45, first decide the matter according to another law and practice of the Order of Sales Tax Act, 1990. Ensure the standard of such economic affairs throughout Pakistan and ensure compliance within 30 days.
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2011
