SULTEX INDUSTRIES versus SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Section 35 Customs Rules, 2001, RR 455 to 460 Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000V), on delay in payment of return claims on sections 2 (3), 9, 10 and 11, on corruption and complaint Unsatisfied dissatisfaction was caused by the customs authorities' disproportionate behavior to exporters due to the controversial attitude of customs officials to delay the payment of duty droprock claims filed under RR 455 to 460 of the Customs Rules 2001. Export incentives were encouraged to be competitive, a 2- to 3-year delay in payment by collector would offend the spirit of the scene. Lauh, when or when the claimant was given priority or attention had filed a writ, or Federal Tax Ombudsman was indifference and incompetence in handling Office. The issue of duty drawings was mismanaged to the Federal Board of Revenue, the chief collector was instructed to resolve the issue. Claims to be made within 30 days in accordance with e-Complainant's law. Establish a committee of relevant officials of the Collectorate of Export to develop viable strategies to address the unacceptable level of administrative delay in processing claims. Claim all 150,000 pending refund claims within three months of law and submit a monthly progress report to the Federal Tax Ombudsman Secretariat \ r \ n
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2011
