GHAZI BAROTHA CONTRACTORS versus SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Section 2 (3), 9, 10 and 11 of Section 170 of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, to the two non-resident contractors, in the absence of the issuance of income tax return Troubled, even after appeals decisions, high court action and allegations made by the department against such irrational and unlawful act under section 2 (3) of the Federal Tax Ombudsman's Ordinance's Office (3) Under serious misconduct, the complainant's representative prayed that action be taken against the relevant authorities. Said accounting of gross injustice and corruption; and that the department should be directed to issue refunds due to complainants. The unpleasant picture of disrespect by departmental officials is clear in the case where the relevant tax officials have acted in a coercive, irresponsible and illegal manner. Not only did he prosecute long, unreasonable litigation, but he also resorted to arbitrary tactics to create illegal demands on various offenders and fines, which were repeatedly outlawed by appellate authorities. Confidence was scattered. Foreign investors, but it also wasted the department's time and energy. Taxpayers created the right to compensation due to unnecessary repayment delays; the irrational, inappropriate, repressive, discriminatory and illegal practices of the relevant tax officials were established, in which case the Federal Board of Revenue had to Recommendations were made to instruct the Chief Commissioner. Refund as per law within 30 days
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2011
