Sections 10 (3) and 11 define the evidence for the adulteration of the oppressor and the kidnapping suspect, the accused was not punished for kidnapping, the rape charge was not proved. The prosecution's claim could not be sustained to maintain the conviction of the accused, could not be sustained; in the circumstances to bring the accused back to the crime, the prosecutor was in charge of proving the ingredients of the crime, The accused was prosecuted along with it that it was alleged that the accused took the photo of the complainant / alleged victim, however, no photo was recovered from the accused. No resistance was offered by the victim in a public place or busy, even on the streets of cities riding on the allegedly affected buses, the victim was not asked to stand trial for such waiver discrimination. It would not be safe to invent and maintain the conviction and sentence recorded by the trial court against the accused, the trial court put aside the unclean decision given by the trial court and the accused was released, Under the circumstances
