Sections 4, 11, 18, 23 and 54 Determination of Compensation Amount of Compensation to the Referee Court Appellants / Landlords, Not satisfied with the Compensation Amount, as determined by the Collector, Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 Was given the award under Increasing the amount granted, claiming that the collector's acquisition of the land violated the mandatory provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. That it did not issue a notice under the relevant provisions. That it set arbitrary rates for land acquired on the owners' back. And that they violated Section 23 of the Referee Court of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, after receiving a request from the collector, followed this procedure and the authorities were given the opportunity to defend the referee's court. It was found that the collector did not follow the procedure provided by the Land Acquisition Act, enable the affected persons to deal with the situation, effectively publish the notification in the official section and land. Without issuing a public notice under section 4 of the Acquisition Act 1894, the 1894 collector silently fixed the rates before passing the invalid award What was The ironic view that once the award was approved, it could not be set aside even by violating the essential provisions of the law; That initially it has to prove the burden on the collector. That it had taken all necessary steps, such as the filing of a notice under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, after the publication of the notice, hearing of the objections under section 5A of the Act, the first of the case.
