MIR HASSAN versus PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY GILGIT-BALTISTAN
Sections 42 and 54 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OLXX, RR1 and 2 Suits for Declaration and Permanent Order Withholding Plaintiff, in response to an advertisement, applied for a written appointment as a school teacher. , But before announcing the result, the defendants, on complaints from various constituencies, canceled the first test and the agitating claimants for the second test were challenged and the second ad declared and a permanent order in their cases. Sent for a waiver and also filed with the plaintiff request for a temporary injunction under O XXXXX. 1, 2, CPC, which was allowed by the trial court appellate court below, however, was to maintain the plaintiff's order that the authorities withheld the pre-emption test for no apparent reason and only for their preferred choice. , Which was opposed by the Assistant Advocate General who severely injured their rights after qualifying the required examination, the plaintiff claimed that the allegations on the transparency of the investigation were investigated through detailed inquiry. Goes and inquiry committee recommended for fresh test, reschedule test to ensure fair and transparent appointments Went to the inquiry report and revealed that the tests were not fair because the in-charge of some test centers had taken serious illegal action and supported their choice, in the present case only to determine the competence in a free and fair manner. There was no choice but to re-take the exam in a free, fair and transparent manner. Regarding the claim of the claimant to be eligible for the examination
