GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY DEFENCE versus GHULAM HUSSAIN
A. IX, R 13 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Sections 5 and 14, Arts 164 and 181 Application for Recovery of Amount Application for Separation of the Ex parte Decree Defending Defendants for Recording of Evidence Did not relinquish the due date even though the case was twice. The trial court adjourned the trial while recording the evidence presented by the plaintiff while the trial court directed the former parties to present evidence to the plaintiff, and the trial court adjourned the case. Appeal of Ex-Hearings Ex-Parties Filed Under O IX, R 13, CPC, to revoke a pre-trial order dismissed by the defendants, the applicants rejected the date of the ex parte decree order. An appeal was filed with a delay in filing an application for. A partial order was passed against the defendants; the trial judge did not decide it because he was involved in some other cases in that date and the postponement date was given by his office / court readers. Office / court readers were neither authorized nor authorized to fix a case for hearing, except that the parties' information could hardly be postponed and a future date could be postponed as it was postponed. The date of the office was the date fixed by the office and not for hearing by the judge, the former court without issue notice to the following court Was unable to pass the order, the period of limitation available to the defendants was three years, provided under Article 181 of the Limitation Act, 1908, and not under the said Act.
