DR. SYED AQEEL GILLANI versus SECRETARY HEALTH, AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Where section 4 (c) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974) applied for deputation to the Teaching Hospital for admission to the Czech Specialization for rejection of the applicant's application for retention of section 44 They also did not receive any objection certificate. Applicant's request for correctness of the applicant without obtaining the NOC from his department at Teaching Hospital was rejected. The applicant's conduct was contrary to the regulatory rules which the executor approved by the Director Health Services. Was challenged, but the applicant did not enforce him as a party. In the applicant's line filed by the applicant, not joining the required party was not feasible; in the absence of the required party, the writ cannot be issued otherwise, as the applicant is a civil servant, An unidentified order cannot be challenged by writ petition. The disclosure of the unnecessary order body was issued in the form of a letter to it, but it affected the applicant's terms and conditions, which were only free. A challenge may be made to the Service Tribunal Providence of Section 4 (c) of the Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunals Act 1975, if any Prior to dismissing the Service Tribunal Wright's pleadings, it may be challenged to order the Malaysian and non-criminal judges.
