MUHAMMAD IRSHAD KHAN versus PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Article 44 Writ Petition Civil Service Examinations On the marking of papers for the recruitment of Civil Judges, the Public Service Commission took the examination for the recruitment of Civil Judges / Section Officers, (Law), etc., Applicant has been appointed as Civil Judge. But they could not qualify for the written test. The petitioner filed an application for scrutiny of his papers, and the Public Service Commission arranged for re-examination in the presence of the applicant, and after re-examination it was found that the applicant had violated civil law. Only 22 numbers were obtained in the papers, while it got zero marks. Not satisfied with the second re-examination, the petitioner filed a petition for re-marking of the papers, dismissing the request that the policy of the Commission did not allow for re-marking of the papers, the applicant on two grounds. Paper identified. First of all, in his estimation the examiner did not give him the correct number in all the questions. For one of the second questions, the inspector gave her a zero number, which was impossible for the examiner to make any illegal move while responding to Wright's request to be merit-free. The zero number was refused.